« April 2006 | MAIN | June 2006 »

gardening

May 19, 2006

purple coneflower

before Since about January, I have been caught up in what I call a gardening craze. I looked out on my backyard one morning, it was dry and leafless and cold as all gardens must look in the dead of winter, and the ground was one big dirt patch, not helped out much by our ever-pacing border collies. And I realized I hadn't the faintest clue about how to garden--how to make something magical, how to grow flowers, anything aside from the occasional random flower planting.

For my birthday in October, the Jones and Jessica and the Standerfers bought me a lovely olive tree. It sat in its pot on our front porch until March, losing all its leaves and looking nearly dead, and I realized it was time to plant something. Little did I know that once I began I couldn't stop. On the coldest day of this year (and admittedly, in this year's weirdly prolonged Texas heat drought, there were only two days in which frost hit), I was outside in my winter clothes and shovel and digging around and looking at the plants that we'd inherited all over our yard and some kind of wild thing came over me. I liked being cold, I liked digging in the dirt, I liked the weird toil and grunt of tackling the earth.

So now, four months later, I have composted, pruned rose bushes, fertilized, built flower beds, planted grass seed, built rock borders--just to name a few things... and not everything is working, but already in one short season I have discovered the weird magical joy of watching things like delicate miniature calla lilies pop up around my St. Francis statue. You plant something, it grows. I don't know, this miracle really fascinates me.

The hard part for me is how to achieve that elusive quality of mystery. My favorite gardens are very mysterious--you don't know where they start and where they end, and you don't quite know how they got there. You just walk in and there's something wild and something unknowable going on. My favorite garden for miles around is next to this little house not far from us. Somehow, on a small plot of land, they were able to create this mysterious little wildflower universe, full of uneven scattered flowers and bunches of grass, and dead tree trunks, and in the spring and summer it is just swarming with butterflies and every sort of bird. You walk by it and all you see is this fluttering and the sun sparkling across it. It is truly a magical little universe, and most people might not even notice it because it is far from obvious. Still, it didn't just get there by accident.... and there are days when I have driven by it, trying not to look like an intruder by stopping long enough to just breathe it in, when I see an older woman standing in the driveway looking out like a farmer over this little field and I see that God is like that, too. He didn't just plant and then say, see ya later. He continues to come back and admire the work--the work--that he did... and sometimes prune, sometimes water, sometimes add a new color, and so on...

So my gardening aesthetic has taken on a sort of 'how to create my own little mystery' yet learn something about the gardening conditions here in Texas and also learn how the Father grows things over time. Already my backyard is untamed, but sometimes untamed in a ridiculous way. Certain things overcrowd other things, some critters eat where they are not supposed to eat, vines consume trees, on and on. And although I like things wild, I am learning to be of the philosophy that things don't just happen they way they are supposed to. It does need care and encouragement, even to resume its wildness.

04

But in the meantime, I am becoming a connoisseur of wildflowers... we took a recent trip to the Ladybird Johnson Wildflower Center in Austin, and if you ever come here or live here, you must go. It is a magical universe. My new favorite flower is the purple coneflower--it is really tall and ridiculously pink and not just a quiet ordinary wildflower--it makes you take notice. (This flower is also what's known as echinacea, so it can be grown for all sorts of medicinal virtues, too.)

walking apostle irisBut there are also exotic plants that behave with some mystery. Like this iris--it's called the walking apostle iris--I like that. When we first moved in this house a year ago, our neighbor gave us a moving in plant that, for lack of knowing what it was or what to do with it, got plugged next to the side of our house. But this year I walked outside to see it blooming, and here was this tiny delicate and very elaborate blossom, almost like an orchid. The next day it was gone! A few weeks later, another bloomed popped up, and sure enough the next day it was gone. It's like you have to be lucky to catch it. I like that. That some things aren't just beckoning you with their neon signs.

After

by Amy at 10:35 AM

The True Story of our Times

May 14, 2006

Watched the first "Mission Impossible" last night, after having recently viewed the third. Not really interested in a critique, though I think the first and the third are uniquely the best for different reasons. But what it got me meditating on was both generations and authority. Conjoined then, the different generations view of authority. I think my own generation inherited a distrust in authority, but expanded the field of distrust out onto all of reality. But before I get there, I was reading the New York Times as I try to do every sunday, and noticed that three of the four front page articles were about breakdowns or perceived breakdowns in authority. Thought I would write my way into at least a partial opinion or observation around this.

First I understand that the "boomer generation" which is a large part of the structure of the city I live in, felt abused by those in authority. They felt dupped and not blessed; and I recognize this left them feeling unvalidated and unaffirmed. So that in much of what has been planted over the past twenty years you have an implied "screw the man" mentality--even while becoming "the man". This has translated into scores of films on hidden conspiracies in government and education, and to much focus on the aspects of leadership which appears or in fact has been corrupt. Some of the critique of culture coming from the boomer generation has indeed been accurate and needed, but also some of it has been born within their collective, and largely unhealed wound with their own fathers. Now how this wound translates into my own generation, and what parts of it, we took in, and have grown our own version of is an interesting question.

Going back to this film, i was trying to figure out what its idea of the heroic was. Like what was this film holding up as an heroic image. Part of it seems to be the image of someone who figured out the corruptions within the system, and stayed true to his personal sense of justice and right. I found that interesting in terms of seeds. For it seems that my own generation similarly values personal creed as being the only trustworthy ideal, but I'm not sure it still holds onto the remnants of justice and doing the right thing. It seems to me that the previous generation still wanted there to be justice and righteousness to put it in more biblical terms; but they had lost trust that the government or anyone in authority, including and perhaps especially in the church, was or is trustworthy. So we are left with something like this: to be heroic, is to find what seems right to you, don't trust anyone in authority, and follow your own code. Now that is something my generation understands, but has expanded, as i said to all of reality. We might add, don't trust the sun to come up tommorrow, cause everything is unreliable, and the only possible truth is personal. And what is "noble"-if we would even use that word-is to stay true to your own code. This, of course, in the end is very solipsistic--which I think is the inevitable outcome of throwing out all trust in authority. If there can be no parental authority whatsoever, then the child must find something within themselves to be the lodestar or guiding principle.

However, are we as a generation as cycnical or distrustful of all authority as the previous generation. I'm not so sure. We were less "hurt" by the fathers, and more simply didn't have fathers. When you don't have a father, you secretly yearn for one, you don't hate them. And that may be a key difference between our generations.

Recently I have tried to befriend in my heart, some people from the "boomer" generation to feel with them what their hurt is, and to figure out why so many feel still so unvalidated, and a thrust to proove their own potency in the world. I have noticed over the years, that this need to proove our ability to make a mark on the world is less pronounced in my own generation than the previous one. As I have tried to grow closer to "boomer" friends, I have noticed, that they actually carry so much that my own generation needs, but the frame or package has such hostility towards "the fathers" that it is often hard to crack it open and get the "goods" so to speak. An example would be trying to learn a skill from them. If, say, you want to learn to garden from a boomer, first you have to sit through a lot of somewhat cynical philosophy about how poorly the previous generation took care of the earth. While true, it is often presented with such implied hostility that it is hard to swallow even the critique, much less find the truths embedded within it. I think this makes it hard to learn from. So then often, my own generation which is quite clever and can learn many systems at once, will just by pass the knowledge, and go on line, and ingest it for themselves. While, giving us the information, it does not impart the wisdom to know how to plant grow it.

Or, we will go to our grandfathers who knew how to garden less as a leisure activity and more as a way of life. And we find more holism there, but again, the world was indeed so different at that stage, that many things we need to grow things now, are not present. For instance, all my grandparents were farmers. They lived at the end of the agricultural south. At the birth of mills, factories-in short, industrialism-of the south. Well, they had, and the ones still alive, still have, the knowledge of the earth etc that we desire, but the package was culturally so different that we have to become translators to uncapsulate it. Now, I think our generation are translators, and actually have the gift of naming the other generations, and telling them who they are, and how they fit together; but it is still difficult for me to transplant what my grandfather knew about planting tobacco into the post-modern setting I find myself in. For one, it is no longer possible for me to farm one hundred acres partly for profit, partly for family need--though perhaps, it should be!

If we look at generations as "generations of God's purposes on earth", then we have to say that these three generations have unique purposes that should fit together to form a pattern. If I say a spiritual "season" is three of these generations, we should be able to name what this season on earth is all about, and see our part within it! So what season are we in. What has been God's purpose for the past three generations and how do they fit together. This is a big question, but one worth at least skirting the edges of. Starting with the "boomer generation"--what was their purpose? Why so many of them? Where did this purpose get thwarted, and how is it being redeemed?

Well, I would say that the purpose of the boomer generation was to evangelize. I know that may sound too religious for some, but let me explain. They were meant to convert energy--the solid, well held energy that the previous generation had stewarded, and to carry it out to the nation and other nations. They were to download the winds of heaven into the solid frame that was given to them, and expand that frame creatively. They were not to just create in reaction to the previous generation, but to expand what had been put into place, and bring wind and creative life into it. Instead, we see that it got hurt by the distance of the previous generations fathers (among other things), and, from an unaffirmed place, tried to build structures in reaction to it--sort of "look dad, at what I made--how creative and colorful and unlike what you made." That late adolescent attitude still pervades many of the companies created from the boomer generation--what the phychologist might call a "reaction formation" stage of development. "Individuation" would be less this identity formed in pushing away from parent, and more, the actual expression of the intrinsic idenity of that person or group. We see this rarely, even at this stage in the boomer generation. There is, as i said, always this need for validation, or this "look dad, I did it cooler". And there is still this constant tearing down of the father--hence, the endless, corruption in government and church articles on the front page.Or within the church circles, the tearing down of how the previous generation "did church"!

So we might say, the purpose could be named, creative reframer and expander; and the wound created instead, "reactor/ deconstructor". By deconstructor I mean to tear down what the previous generation built in anger at having not gotten its blessing to expand. Now comes my own generation. We picked this up, and took it out into deconstructing all of reality. If the fathers are hopeless, and there can be no reliable authority to look to, then we will create our own reality--the obvious shadow of which is solipsism-a completely self contained universe--gaming, web-based reality, a virtual life with no rules outside of itself. Now, if, and i believe we are, my generation is a watershed generation at the apex of a turning-at an axial moment in generations and seasons; if we are to be one who names and teaches the generations to themselves so as to discern God's pattern or purposes, if so, then my own generation has gone even deeper into the rabit hole of self than the boomers. For we no longer even react to things ourside ourselves, we have gone into the complexity of naming the labyrinth of our own imaginary worlds which we ourselvs create.

My own generation is meant to be a prophetic generation in this sense--we are to help name from above, tell things who they are, and how they are to work together. We are not necessarily great builders, but have inherited much of the creativity of the previous generation. But in addition, we have an awareness which can see outside of all the systems-even the ones we are in, and name from that awareness. This is definitely a teachers gift. I would call my own generation "prophetic teacher". Now it seems obvious to me, what our "fall" was--we turned our great naming gift in on ourselves, and have only been able to constantly name the already deconstructed floating blocks of reality left from the previous generations dismantling of our grandfather's generation's work. We have become namers of debris, and will remain so, if we do not have our vision contextualized by something higher, something more spiritual--ie by God and His Kingdom. When those of my own generation enter the reality of the kingdom, we then have a purpose for our naming gifts, and can be useful on the earth again. You see this in the case of Bono, or the few others, from my generation who have found a larger context for their giftings.They are able to name things accurately, and in a helpful way, while remaining somewhat "outside" the systems which they are naming. There is this ironic emersion as Bono calls it, in life. This ironic awareness, was not just given for us to be endlessly clever in our advertizing or mags, but to actually offer to the other generations as larger naming of the context they are in, and help people know their place. This is the one of the roles of the prophetic in the culture at large. And a few who have gone through the Christ-centered transformation necessary to know one's own identity, are starting to stand into this role. And many are not.

I recently went to a viewing hosted by Quentin Tarentino and another teacher from my generation, and again was shocked by the endless naming without any interpretation or contextualization. This is not to say that these two film makers are not brilliant and clever and really new in many ways--but they were unable to get "outside" the naming of the debris, and really speak truth and contextualize things in a way which could teach--in short, they were unable to offer the gift they carried to others. And, maybey worse, to have the humility to see that it was indeed a gift. So I think one of my generations troubles is that we don't know why we have this gift of awareness and the ability to understand the symbolic level of things.

The restoration of the symbolic is another topic, but one which I think my generation should be heralding! We are in fact the beginning of this restoration in many ways. When the symbolic realm is once again connected to the earth, we will see on many new levels, what God is trying to teach about Himself through life. This is the true role of all artist--to help us learn to understand the symbolic and to discern that realm of dream, vision, and ritual. But, this is another topic for another essay. Here, just to mention that this is one of our roles in the story as a generation.

My parent's generation, which I have only hinted at, had the role of building and holding solid structures, which could provide resources for the aquadic generations to come. There characteristics were meant to be steadfastness and faithfulness and value holders. As you see, they fell short as all other generations have, and many started putting their personal security in these structures which they created--this creating a new form of idolatry. Still, the solidity of the infrastructures built were meant to allow freedom of form for the two following generation to flow within.

In closing, I want to suggest that there is a connection between the past three generations, and that part of my job as a member of the last one, is to name this connection. This is just a rant, but we will be writing more on this topic in the not to distant future to explore it with more balance and gusto. I think it is helpful when you go to movies to ask which generational perspective it contains. And then place it in a larger pattern. To get the story of the generations will take patience and probably some healing on all our parts, but is worth it to get at the true story of our times!

by derek at 8:41 PM

little seeds and gems

May 13, 2006


I’ve only heard this spoken of in “charismatic” wings of the Body, but it is an extremely valuable gem, with very practical implications. Outside the charismatics, the only writer I’ve read who really breaks it down is Watchman Nee in his, “Spiritual Man”.

Here is this diamond seed ( i join Paul in mixing my metaphores--but perhaps unlike paul, i do so intentionally or at least with self awareness!) I found about five years ago...

We are tripartide, made up of three parts--spirit, soul and body. Each goes through a maturation process. The spirit is the highest, and is to be in charge of the others. This is God’s order. When we are born “again” our spirit is a baby, and not big or mature enough to be in charge of the rest of us--so often we need those with larger more mature spirits around us constantly, so that our soul doesn’t take the throne. But we are to be growing our spirits, until they are mature enough to govern ourselves internally. David says to his soul---be still, your not in charge.
Now we know that the soul is not bad in itself as the gnostics taught that all matter was evil; but the soul is also not the leader, but the spirit or inner man is. The inner man is what God’s Spirit communicates and communes with, and is like sort of the inner priest of highest authority within us.

The spirit matures, and needs nourishment--here you have the things of the spirit needing to be ingested in active form! Things are activated by The Holy Spirit. It needs to be real “spiritual” food, not just the religious form of food. It is not enough to just see people who believe in Jesus, we must actually commune, and actually fellowship--this is from spirit to spirit and is only possible through Christ. Lots of people think they can get their spirit fed just by going to the building or seeing enough people who call themselves Christians--that won’t do; you need to actually touch Christ in the people He has given you--it has to get spirit to spirit in order to provide food. The blood needs to flow from the different parts of the Body into and out from you, in order to be growing. We must get hidden in the Body--that is true fellowship, and is at least one aspect of growing or maturing our spirit.

“The might of our spirit, derives from the power of God’s Spirit...and our spirit needs to be trained.” Trained to discern soul from spirit. Man’s thoughts, from God’s. Spiritual realms from other realms etc. We are to be growing, ourselves able to, with His Word, divide spirit and soul! Hebrew 4:12 (remembering that 4x3 is twelve--ie completion). In order to divide what is spiritual from what is created from the soul realm, we must begin to discern this within ourselves--what part of this is my own thoughts from my soul; and what is from above coming into my spirit or my inner man. We need to know this, so that we can use the Word like a sword in ourselves!

This way of seeing ourselves, has practical implications. Watchman Nee writes the most clearly on this subject in his book “The Spiritual Man”--which is really a “chicken soup for the end times soul” book! This book is put out by Christian Fellowship publishers and so far is the most extended meditation on this teaching of the division of spirit, soul and body that I have yet come across. Very few believers I know, really experientially can discern between what is soulical and what is spiritual. This teaching hasn’t gone into the soil of the Body deep enough yet--but really must if we are overcome the level of darkness being released on the earth in our day.

My second cousin is perhaps Johnny Appleseed. He liked carrying seeds--not always understanding everything about them, but knowing they were extremely valuable, and also knowing exactly where they were to be planted. He left literally thousands of scattered groves all over the north american continent. I think that seeds are often more important than the fruit. In that the seed produces the fruit, and it requires more faith, and faith pleases God! Anyways, I'm still collectin em!

by derek at 7:59 PM